Wednesday, 6 July 2016

Mauritania Imprisons Anti-Slavery Activists

A wave of arrests in Mauritania have landed anti-slavery activists behind bars.

Authorities arrested at least nine activists between June 29 and July 3 and denied them access to their families and lawyers, according to Amnesty International.

The activists are part of the Initiative for Resurgent Abolition Movement (IRA), one of the main organizations that have shone a spotlight on the persistence of slavery in Mauritania.

They were arrested following a protest against the forced removal of a group of about 20 Mauritanians who had been living in a shantytown on the outskirts of the capital, Nouakchott, and were relocated by security forces to a more remote area. The protests over relocation became violent and resulted in injuries to demonstrators and members of the security force and damage to property.

The government hasn’t officially responded, and the Mauritanian Embassy in Washington didn’t respond to VOA’s request for comment on the arrests. However, one of the governors of Mauritania’s capital, Mahy Ould Ahmed, said the IRA arrests were “provoked by a movement known for its extremism,” according to Reuters.

The people removed are of a darker-skinned ethnic group who have historically been discriminated against in the country, according to Sadibou Marong, Amnesty International's West Africa press officer.

Marong said the land was private and did not belong to those who were living there, but unconfirmed reports said Mauritanian officials were trying to clean up the capital in advance of hosting an Arab League summit this month.

He said the jailed activists have been held incommunicado, and "even the family members don’t know" where they are. “We are calling for the government of Mauritania to free them."

Marong said the anti-slavery activists are being targeted as troublemakers by security forces, even though they are only exercising constitutionally protected rights of freedom of expression and association. The longtime repression of these people "has started to really become violent ... and we are calling on the Mauritanian government to stop that.”

Awarded in U.S.

The IRA's president, Biram Dah Abeid, and vice president, Brahim Bilal Ramdane, who were not among those arrested, were recently invited to Washington by the U.S. State Department. They were awarded the Trafficking in Persons Heroes Award on June 30, 2016.

Biram Dah Abeid has been arrested several times in the past for fighting slavery. He told his story from Aleg prison in Mauritania last year, saying: “In the past five years, I have been imprisoned three times. I have been locked up during key events of my adult life, including the birth of my daughter. I celebrated my 50th birthday behind bars on 12 January 2015.”

Siikam Sy, a member of the board of directors of IRA-USA, said he is concerned for the safety of the activists. He said Mauritania’s heavy-handed approach is counterproductive to addressing the issue of modern slavery.

“The government is making a huge mistake by aiming or seeking to basically decapitate IRA-Mauritania, when in fact what it should have done is look at IRA-Mauritania as a partner in ending slavery,” he said. “We continue to demonstrate, and each one of those demonstrations is met with unbelievable violence from the police. We will continue because we think this is a human rights issue.”

He pointed out that although the organization is recognized and supported around the world, it is not recognized in Mauritania itself.

“The fact is that you can still buy and sell human beings in Mauritania, and this is backed by facts on the ground,” he said. “On one side you have a government that denies, denies, denies, and on the other side you have the IRA that will continue to push so that the government could take tangible steps toward eradicating, eliminating the practice of slavery in Mauritania.”

Let's block ads! (Why?)



via Voice of America http://ift.tt/29A5Shl

Defenders, Critics Stand Their Ground Following British Iraq Report

Western reaction to Britain's 6,000-page report on the Iraq war reflects the remorse of hindsight, but leaders who played a part in going to war are standing by their decisions.

White House spokesman Josh Earnest said Wednesday that the president and his staff have not yet read all the way through the lengthy document, but he said President Barack Obama "has been dealing with the consequences of that fateful decision for the entirety of his presidency." He also said it is important that the United States "learn the lessons of those past mistakes."

The decision to go to war was fueled by the belief that former Iraqi leader Saddam Hussein had a store of weapons of mass destruction that could have been used on the United States and its allies. That intelligence assessment was later proved to be mistaken.

A spokesman for former U.S. President George W. Bush, who ordered the invasion of Iraq in 2003, released a statement Wednesday saying, "Despite the intelligence failures and other mistakes he has acknowledged previously, President Bush continues to believe the whole world is better off without Saddam Hussein in power."

Expert: Not all alternatives exhausted

Public policy expert William Galston of the Brookings Institution told VOA on Wednesday that he agrees with the report that the international community had not yet exhausted all other options to eliminate the Iraqi threat.

FILE - U.S. Marine Corp Assaultman Kirk Dalrymple watches as a statue of Iraq's President Saddam Hussein falls in central Baghdad, April 9, 2003.
FILE - U.S. Marine Corp Assaultman Kirk Dalrymple watches as a statue of Iraq's President Saddam Hussein falls in central Baghdad, April 9, 2003.

He noted that U.N. arms inspector Hans Blix has maintained that the U.N. sanctions regime "was not as weak as was represented, and was not in eminent danger of crumbling, that the inspections regime was very robust, and that Saddam couldn't have done anything major without being detected or without expelling the international inspectors."

Galston says one of the big questions the report raises is "whether the status quo was as untenable as the international community said it was."

Paul Bremer, who led the occupational authority in Iraq after the invasion in 2003, wrote in Britain's The Guardian that the risks incurred by invasion were far less than those of leaving Saddam in power. He said the 9/11 attacks on the United States intensified pressure to confront international threats.

"After 9/11," he writes, "no American president could dismiss the possibility that a state sponsor would provide devastating weapons to terrorist groups, or use them itself." He notes that Saddam's government had used biological weapons against Iraqi Kurds in 1988.

Bremer concluded his piece with the assertion that "it was the correct, if difficult, decision to remove Saddam Hussein. Had we not done so, today we would likely confront a nuclear armed Iraq facing off against a nuclear armed Iran. Bad as the unrest in the region is today, that would be worse."

Threat estimates

Former U.S. Ambassador to the U.N. John Bolton, now a senior fellow at the conservative think tank American Enterprise Institute, wrote in London's The Telegraph Wednesday that the decision to invade was defensible. He said, "Intelligence can underestimate as well as overestimate a threat. … Saddam lied about his capabilities and about trashing them. Had he stayed in power, he would today have even larger chemical stockpiles."

FILE - Then-President George Bush declares the war over in Iraq, May 1, 2003. Behind him on board the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln is a banner reading: "Mission Accomplished."
FILE - Then-President George Bush declares the war over in Iraq, May 1, 2003. Behind him on board the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln is a banner reading: "Mission Accomplished."

But those opposing the decision to go to war at the beginning are also sticking to their positions. U.S. foreign policy analyst David Rothkopf of the journal Foreign Affairs tweeted his response to the report Wednesday, saying, "Somehow 'sorry' doesn't seem like enough, does it? OK after a small traffic accident maybe. A catastrophic war, no."

French Ambassador to the United States Gerard Araud tweeted, "May I remind everybody how France was abused and denigrated for opposing the war? France was right!" He continued, "Not only a geopolitical disaster, not only distortion and manipulation, but also a human tragedy."

And the Russian Embassy in London uncharacteristically made a joke. Playing on a British slogan from World War II, the embassy posted an image saying, "Keep calm, but I told you so."

And in Washington, the U.S. State Department renewed its travel warning on Iraq. The new warning tells U.S. citizens that travel in Iraq remains "very dangerous."

Let's block ads! (Why?)



via Voice of America http://ift.tt/29tnWae

ECB Threatens Legal Action Against Slovenia After Police Raid

The European Central Bank threatened to take legal action against Slovenia on Wednesday after police seized documents from the country's central bank in a rare conflict between authorities and one of the eurozone's most respected institutions.

ECB President Mario Draghi said he deplored the seizure, which infringes on the ECB's legal privileges and immunities, and called on European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker to intervene.

Slovenian police conducted an investigation Wednesday in four locations in Ljubljana, including at the central bank, collecting evidence in a pre-criminal investigation related to possible irregularities during a bank overhaul in 2013.

"Seized equipment contains ECB information and such information is protected under directly applicable primary EU law," Draghi said in a letter to the Slovenian State Prosecutor General. "The ECB will also explore possible appropriate legal remedies under Slovenian law."

FILE - European Central Bank President Mario Draghi speaks during a news conference in Frankfurt, Germany, June 6, 2013.FILE - European Central Bank President Mario Draghi speaks during a news conference in Frankfurt, Germany, June 6, 2013.

x

FILE - European Central Bank President Mario Draghi speaks during a news conference in Frankfurt, Germany, June 6, 2013.
FILE - European Central Bank President Mario Draghi speaks during a news conference in Frankfurt, Germany, June 6, 2013.

The ECB said police seized information on the computers of Bank of Slovenia Governor Bostjan Jazbec, who sits on the ECB's rate-setting Governing Council, as well as a former deputy governor and some staff members.

Slovenian police said the investigation related to an assessment of one of the banks rescued by the state in 2013, which meant the bank could scrap its obligations toward holders of subordinated bonds and subordinated debt in the value of 257 million euros.

In 2013, the previous government had to pour more than 3 billion euros ($3.33 billion) into local banks to prevent them from collapsing under a large amount of bad loans. The move helped the country narrowly avoid an international bailout.

As part of the bank overhaul, about 600 million euros of subordinated bonds were scrapped in five banks.

In 2014, the Slovenian Association of Small Shareholders filed several court cases against the Bank of Slovenia and local banks, claiming the subordinated bonds and shareholders' capital in rescued banks should not have been erased. None of the cases have been finished yet.

The Bank of Slovenia had repeatedly rejected allegations that it mishandled data used when putting together a rescue package for Slovenia's banks.

Let's block ads! (Why?)



via Voice of America http://ift.tt/29iS4mh